Author Archive

Dangerous Roads for Motorcycles: What You Need to Know About Your Rights on a Motorcycle

According to a study by the Institute for Research & Evaluation commissioned by The Transportation Construction Coalition and released May 2009, roadway condition is a contributing factor in more than half—52.7—of the nearly 42,000 American deaths resulting from motor vehicle crashes each year and 38 percent of the non-fatal injuries. In terms of crash outcome severity, roadway condition is the single most contributing factor—greater than speeding, alcohol, or non-use of seatbelts. Although the study was limited to motor vehicles, and the facts that motorcycles are lighter and less stable, it is a sure bet that roadway conditions are a contributing factor in at least the same percent of cases of motor vehicles, and most likely higher.

Five elements must be proved by the injured party or heirs to prevail in a case against a public entity for injuries or loss of a loved one:

    1. The public entity owned or controlled the road(s) involved in the accident;
    2. The roads involved were in a dangerous condition at the time of the accident;
    3. The dangerous condition caused the accident;
    4. The accident occurred in a way which the public entity could reasonably anticipate would result from the dangerous condition; and
    5. The dangerous condition resulted either from the public entity’s carelessness (negligence) of a public employee’s negligence or from the public entity’s failure to take reasonably prompt remedial action in response to receiving actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition.

However, the public entity and employee have certain immunities from lawsuits that make handling a motorcycle case against a public body more difficult. The California Government Code gives immunity to public entities (state, county, city, etc.) and public employees for injuries caused by the plan or design of a construction or an improvement to public property. Although this “design immunity” applies to all construction or improvements of any public property, it is most often raised as a defense in cases involving highways and streets that are allegedly defective in design and caused injury or death to a motorcyclist.

Under the design immunity rule, a motorcyclist who was injured by a defect in the highway or road ordinarily cannot recover any monetary compensation from the governmental entity provided the governmental entity or public employee can prove three things: (1) the design was approved by the governmental board or agency in advance of the work starting; (2) there is any substantial evidence from which the court may determine that a reasonable public employee or legislative body could have adopted the plan or design; and (3) the negligence design was a fault in causing the accident.

However, the government’s immunity is limited to design-caused accidents. It does not relieve the governmental body from liability caused by negligence independent of the design, such as a failure to warn of a dangerous condition or the failure of the governmental body to maintain the road or highway in a reasonably safe condition.

Design immunity applies only where the design or plan was expressly approved in advance. It does not apply to details or features that were not considered by the governmental body in approving the plan. In one case, a driver was hit head-on by another vehicle that had illegally crossed into her lane of travel. The vehicle went over a steep embankment into a channel from which the embankment had been excavated and overturned, causing the drowning death of the driver. The heirs of the driver were successful in their lawsuit against the State of California, as the State failed to show that the public official having discretionary authority to approve the design in advance of the construction had considered the embankment’s steep slope. Since the immunity defense does not apply to decisions that have not been made prior to the plan’s approval, the court held that the doctrine of design immunity did not bar the survivors’ suit and they could proceed with the matter.

Design immunity also does not provide a defense where the physical conditions have changed since the design was approved. When there has been a change in conditions, the public entity is given a reasonable time to obtain funds for the new construction necessary to eliminate the danger. If the public entity is unable to remedy the danger because of impracticability or a lack of funds, the immunity nevertheless continues so long as the public entity provides adequate warnings of the dangerous condition.

Some of the dangerous road conditions for which a public entity can be held liable include:

  • Dangerous curves in the road (failure to put up a warning sign or an improper bank)
  • Dangerous slopes and dips
  • Hazards obstructing the motorcyclists vision, such as trees and shrub at an intersection
  • Failing to warn of or keeping the road free from loose gravel (which is more dangerous to the motorcyclist than ice)
  • Road surface with inadequate skid resistance
  • Uneven pavement and shoulders
  • Improper drainage that causes the road to become wet or puddles to form
  • Improper signal timing or faulty signals
  • Broken, defaced, deteriorated, or missing traffic signs or signals (such as a missing stop sign)
  • Poorly marked shoulders that are not visibly distinct from the road
  • Failure to maintain the road (such as by fixing potholes and cracks and removing debris)
  • Missing median barriers
  • Missing guardrails
  • Inadequate lighting on roads and highways
  • Missing or poorly marked construction zones
  • Dangerous or unmarked railroad crossings
  • Dangerous street or pavement drop-offs, such as cliffs or ravines
  • Narrow lanes
  • Inadequate clear roadway to allow a motorcyclist who has run off the road to regain control of his or her bike
  • Lack of yellow line or other pavement markings
  • Hazards adjacent to the roadway
  • Dangerous bridges
  • Short or reduced radius freeway off-ramps

California law provides that condition of public property is not dangerous merely because the public entity failed to provide regulatory traffic control signals, signs, or “distinctive roadway markings.” However, if the dangerous condition of the roadway exists for reasons other than or in addition to the failure to provide traffic controls, signs, or markings, the public entity is financially responsible (“liable”) for the deaths of or injuries to the motorcyclist and his or her passenger, if any.

A public entity is immune from liability only in those situations where the dangerous condition exists solely as a result of the public entity’s failure to provide a regulatory traffic device street marking. If a traffic intersection is dangerous for reasons other than the failure to provide regulatory signs or markings, the public entity is liable for damages or deaths arising from the accident. Thus, if an intersection is dangerous not only because of the lack of warnings or regulatory signs or signals but also because of the presence of other factors such as the presence of trees and brushes that block the view of any regulatory signs (such as stop signs), the public entity is legally responsible for the injuries or death.

Generally speaking, a public entity is not liable for an injury or death caused by the failure to provide traffic or warning signals, signs, markings, or devices described in the Vehicle Code. However, this statute does not relieve the public entity or public employee from liability for injury proximately caused by such failure if a signal, sign, marking, or device was necessary to warn of a dangerous condition which endangered the safe movement of traffic and which would not be reasonably apparent to, and would not have been anticipated by, a person exercising due care. In other words, if the dangerous condition constitutes a hidden “trap” to the motorcyclist, resulting in his or her being injured or killed, the public entity can be held liable for the injuries or death. A trap is a condition that is not reasonably apparent to, and would not have been anticipated by, a motorcyclist exercising due care.

For a public entity to be held liable for a defective dangerous road, the defect must be created by a public employee, or the public entity must have had knowledge of the defect in sufficient time to fix it. There are two types of notice, either of which will suffice to make the public entity liable. The first is “actual” notice, in which the public entity, through its employees, actually knew of the defect. The second type of notice is “constructive” notice. A public entity has constructive notice of the dangerous condition when the condition has existed for a such a length of time and was of such an obvious nature that the public entity, in the exercise of due care, should have discovered the condition and its dangerous character.

Evidence that may be presented at trial includes whether the existence of the condition and its dangerous character would have been discovered by an inspection system that was reasonably adequate to inform the public entity whether the property was safe for the use or uses for which the public entity actually knew others were making of the public property or adjacent property. Also admissible as evidence in a trial is whether the public entity maintained and operated such an inspection system with due care and did not discover the condition.

If you have been injured or a loved one killed due to a dangerous road motorcycle accident, you should contact an experienced personal injury law firm as soon as possible. When deciding on which attorney or law firm you should hire to represent you, you should be guided by several factors. First of all, you should choose someone with experience in your type of injury. Second, you will want a lawyer or law firm that is competent, able to handle the case. Third, you want a lawyer or law firm with integrity. Fourth, you want to retain a lawyer or law firm that has the highest ethical standards.

It is also important to contact an experienced personal injury law firm promptly, as the law firm may want to send its own investigators to examine the evidence before it is lost or changed. In a case involving dangerous roads, it is especially important that the investigator get to the scene of the accident as soon as possible to prevent others from changing it. The investigator will want to take pictures of the accident and dangerous road, as well as inspecting and taking pictures of the damaged motorcycle. Finally, the investigator will want to talk to any and all witnesses to the accident as soon as possible, while the facts are still fresh in their minds. The lawyer may want to hire an expert in traffic accident reconstruction to recreate exactly how the accident happened.

An experienced personal injury law firm can also help with seeing to it that you obtain appropriate and thorough medical care for your physical, emotional, and psychological injuries suffered as a result of the accident. The attorneys in the firm can also do everything possible to ensure that you obtain full compensation for your medical expenses, pain and suffering, mental anguish, property damage, lost wages, loss of enjoyment of life, and all of your other injuries and damages.

Share

Anatomy of a Personal Injury Claim

Personal injuries due to another person’s carelessness (“negligence”) come in a wide variety of situations. Injuries or deaths suffered in automobile accidents are the number one type of accidental injury or death in the United States. But there can be many causes of injury: a defective product, a motorcycle accident, a boating accident, a pedestrian struck by a car while trying to cross the street, a slip on a wet grocery store floor, an airplane accident, a fall off a defective ladder, a bus accident, etc.

Because automobile accidents are the most frequent cause of injuries and deaths, we’ll use that scenario as a hypothetical case. Suppose you are driving down a four-lane street one day at 45 miles per hour, the legal posted speed limited, coming towards an intersection, and there is a green light in your direction. However, a car coming from the opposite direction makes a left-hand turn right in front of you. You hit the brakes and turn the steering wheel in an attempt to avoid the collision, but it’s not enough. The cars collide and you sustain significant personal injuries.

What should you do first? One of the first things you should do is check to see whether you or any of your passengers are bleeding or otherwise in need of some serious first aid. Dial 911 to summon the paramedics and the police, sheriff, or highway patrol. If you suffered neck pain or your head was thrown violently backward and forward (“whiplash”), or your back hurts, you may not want to move until the paramedics arrive and check you out. You may have sustained trauma to your spinal cord or fractured a spinal vertebra that if moved incorrectly could result in paralysis. Paramedics will be able to put you in a soft collar to immobilize your neck and use a solid spinal board and strap you to it to reduce the possibility of injuring your back further.

You may have suffered other serious injuries, such as a head injury or fractures to your arms, legs, ribs, pelvis, hip, or other bones. If an airbag deployed, you may suffer damages to your hearing because of the noise of the explosive used to inflate the airbag or damages to your face and head by the explosive force of the airbag deploying. If your car is not equipped with an airbag, you may suffer serious face and head injuries by hitting your head against the steering wheel. In such a case, the paramedics should take you to the nearest emergency room for evaluation and treatment.

If the police respond to your accident, they should conduct an on-the-scene investigation, getting personal and insurance information from the parties involved and statements from any witnesses. After speaking with the drivers and witnesses, and taking measurements of skid marks and location of where the cars end up, the police will file their report, which may place the blame on either or both drivers. Based on their investigation, the police officer may give a ticket to the driver who made the unsafe left turn in front of you, or the officer may conduct a further investigation and issue the ticket a week or two later.  Often times, even if a party is found to be the cause of the accident, the police will not issue a citation.

If you have been injured beyond needing simple first aid to treat superficial lacerations and contusions (cuts and bruises), the paramedics will transport you to the nearest emergency room or to the nearest emergency room that is designated as a trauma center. At the emergency room, a nurse or doctor will make an initial assessment of your condition to determine whether you need immediate treatment or whether you can wait half an hour or an hour, depending upon how busy the emergency room happens to be at the time. The preliminary evaluation of patients is known as “triage,” and is designed to get the most seriously injured patients the fastest medical treatment.

You may undergo a series of diagnostic procedures, such as x-rays or a CT scan to determine whether you have broken any bones or other injuries. If you hit your head in the accident, a neurological examination should be performed to assess whether you sustained any traumatic brain injury. The neurological exam should also assess whether you may have an epidural or subdural hematoma in your brain that requires immediate treatment. If you have suffered a serious injury such as serious burns over a significant part of your body, severe injuries to your spine that paralyze you, a severe head injury, or some other catastrophic injury, after you have been stabilized you will likely be transferred to a hospital or rehabilitation center that specializes in your type of injury.

You should report the accident to your own insurance agent as soon as possible. In cases involving personal injury, death, or property damage in excess of $750.00, a form (an SR-1) must be filed with the Department of Motor Vehicles within 10 days of the accident.

If you have been injured due to another person’s negligence—especially if the injuries are more than minimal—you should consider retaining an experienced personal injury lawyer as soon as possible. The lawyer will notify the other person’s insurance company that he or she is representing you, and all communications regarding the accident should be to his or her office. The experienced personal injury lawyer will understand the medical, physical, financial, and psychological ramifications of your injury. The insurance adjuster assigned to your case may try to persuade you not to get a lawyer involved, because they will take a large chunk of your settlement. Studies show, however, that accident victims represented by a lawyer end up with more money in their own pockets even after paying the lawyers’ fees than if they handled the case on their own.

Your prospective attorney may have you fill out a patient questionnaire before you meet with him or her. By all means, take all the documents and pictures of the damage to your car or other property damage, and pictures of your injuries you have to the first meeting with the attorney. This may be the police report, medical bills, records and any doctor’s report or results of diagnostic procedure (such as an X-ray, CT scan, or MRI report), and information regarding the days you were off work. Don’t worry or postpone your meeting with the attorney if you don’t have these forms and records. If you decide to retain the attorney, he or she will have you sign documents allowing health care providers to send you a copy of your file and all charges, or employers stating how much you were earning before the accident, how many days you were off work, or if you couldn’t return to your old job because of the injury. If you decide the lawyer is competent enough and experienced in your type of case, he or she will have you sign a retainer agreement. Your lawyer will immediately notify the insurance company and its adjuster that he or she has been retained to represent you and all communications regarding the case go through his or her office, and they are not to contact you (the client) directly.

In catastrophic injury or death cases, it frequently happens that the person who caused your injury or your loved one’s death does not enough insurance to cover all of the bills of hospitalization, lost wages, lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, and other injuries. The reality of it is that bank presidents or financial moguls rarely cause accidents. California requires only that a person have insurance limits up to $15,000 per person injured, to a total of $30,000 for any one accident (regardless of how many people were injured and the extent of their injuries), and $5,000 in property damage. But if the person who injured you or killed your loved one was on the job at the time, you can sue the company as well, and its insurance limits should be considerably higher. Similarly, if the person who hurt you was a government employee and was working at the time of the accident, the government is liable for the injuries. Be advised, however, that if you are dealing with a governmental employee, you are generally required to file a claim with the appropriate governmental agency usually within six months of the accident. An experienced personal injury lawyer can help you with making the claim.

Suppose you were seriously injured by a careless driver, but he or she has only minimum coverage. If your injuries are substantial and liability was clear (that is, there is no question that the other driver caused the accident and you were no way at fault for the accident), the other party’s insurance company will generally pay the full amount of the policy (the “policy limits”) with little hesitancy. However, in cases like this, if you have underinsured motorist insurance coverage that exceeds $15,000, and your injuries are more than this, you may make a claim against your own insurance company for the policy limits of your own insurance policy (assuming you purchased underinsured coverage as part of your policy). Similarly, if the driver who hit you didn’t have any insurance at all, you can make a claim under the uninsured motorist provision of your own insurance policy if you are so covered.

At some point in the negotiations with the insurance company, it will make its “last, best settlement offer.” Or your lawyer may preempt such a letter from the insurance company with his or her own “demand letter,” demanding that the insurance company settle for a certain amount or you will go to trial. If you feel that the insurance company’s settlement offer is too low, or the insurance company rejects your lawyer’s demand, you and your lawyer then have the decision to make regarding accepting the insurance company’s offer or taking the case to trial to have a jury decide on who was at fault for the accident and how much to award. The jury may award more than what the insurance company was offering. But then again they may award less or even nothing at all. The jury may conclude that the accident was your fault or that you could have avoided it. Stories abound of plaintiffs who were offered $100,000, $250,000 or even more to settle their case, but the plaintiff turned it down and the jury came back with a defense verdict (that is, the jury found in favor of the defendant, giving the plaintiff nothing).

In some cases, several weeks or months after the accident, the lawyer may set up an appointment for you with a psychologist or psychiatrist for a mental health evaluation. For example, you may be having trouble sleeping and keep reliving the accident (a psychological disorder known a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). After an automobile accident, you may develop an apprehension or fear of driving or other psychological injuries. These are real and serious injuries that you should seek treatment for as early as possible.

Over 95 percent of all personal injury cases are settled without having to go to a full-blown trial. Nevertheless, the attorney must prepare the case meticulously, as though it is going to trial. If the plaintiff’s attorney and the insurance company (or its lawyer) cannot agree on a fair settlement amount, the plaintiff’s attorney will file a “complaint” with the court against the person and company who harmed his or her client or killed the client’s loved one. Within 30 days, the defense must file an “answer” to the complaint with the court. Rather than filing an answer, the defense may file a “demurrer” to the complaint, which essentially says that the plaintiff’s complaint didn’t allege the defendant did anything legally wrong and therefore they are not obligated to pay anything (that is, they are not “liable” for the defendant’s injuries and other damages.)

After the complaint and answer have been filed, the case moves into the “discovery” phase. Each party may send the other written questions (“interrogatories”) to answer under penalty of perjury. Depositions of the parties to the lawsuit will be taken. In a deposition, a lawyer for the other side asks questions of the party or witness being deposed. Depositions usually take place in the attorney’s office, and a court reporter is present to record the deposition. The court reporter will swear you in and the effect of the testimony is the same as if you were testifying in open court under penalty of perjury. Before your deposition, your attorney should go over it with you and what to expect. Some common advice is not to volunteer any information, answer the questions as briefly and succinctly as you can, and if you don’t understand a question, don’t guess at what they mean but ask the attorney to rephrase the question. If you have any problems during the deposition, don’t understand a question, or feel that you are being harassed or intimidated, you have the right to stop the proceedings to talk to your lawyer in private. You will not be alone at a deposition; your attorney will accompany you. In a deposition, the attorney is allowed to ask questions that would not be admissible in court, but must be reasonably related to the discovery of admissible evidence.

In cases of serious personal injury, the defense lawyer may wish to have the plaintiff examined by its doctors. This is known as an Independent Medical Evaluation (IME).

Here’s a brief look at how a personal injury trial unfolds:

First, a jury of 12 people are selected to hear the case. The jury comes from a pool of citizens from all walks of life. It used to be fairly easy to get excused from jury duty, but because this often led to an insufficient number of people available to be jurors, the courts have made it much more difficult to get excused from jury duty. In most courtrooms, the judge will ask a series of global questions to see if anyone cannot serve on the jury or the potential jury members know any of the witnesses or the lawyers. If the trial is expected to last more than a week or so, the judge may ask the potential jury members if they are available to hear the case if goes several weeks or even months.

After the judge is finished questioning the potential jurors, the lawyers for both sides get the opportunity to ask questions of individual jurors. Every attorney has his or her own style of questioning the jury and determining whether he or she would want a particular juror deciding their client’s fate. The attorney will ask questions such as the person’s educational, political and religious background, what he or she does for a living, what the juror thinks of people who bring lawsuits, whether the prospective juror has ever been involved in a lawsuit before, whether the juror can put aside his or her own feelings about lawsuits and decide the case fairly based on the evidence presented to the jury, and a number of other questions designed to elicit whether the juror would be sympathetic to his or her client’s plight or would be more likely to vote in favor of the insurance company. In catastrophic injuries, the attorney may sometimes hire a jury consultant (who is usually a psychologist) to help determine whether the juror is likely to be for or against his or her client’s case.

After a jury acceptable to both sides has been chosen and sworn in, the judge may say a few words to the jury about the general nature of the case. Then the plaintiff’s attorney will give his or her “opening statement.” An opening statement is designed to tell the injury what evidence the attorney will present to the jury to establish his or her client’s right to be compensated (“damages”). The attorney can only recite the facts he or she intends to present at trial to establish the defendant’s fault (“liability”). The attorney is not entitled to argue the case at this point to the jury. Closing arguments come at the end of the trial. After the plaintiff’s attorney has given his or her opening statement, the lawyer for the defendant (really, the insurance company) will have the chance to make his or her opening. The defense lawyer may wish to give his or her opening statement immediately after the plaintiff’s lawyer has given his or her own opening statement, or the defense counsel may wait to give his or her opening statement after the plaintiff’s attorney has rested his or her case.

After both sides have made their opening statements (or the defense lawyer has decided to give his or her opening statement when the plaintiff’s attorney rests his or her case), the plaintiff’s attorney presents his or her “case in chief.” A word about the burden of proof the plaintiff’s attorney must meet: In a criminal case, we are all familiar with the standard that the defendant’s guilt must be proved “beyond a reasonable doubt.” In a civil case the standard is much lower: The plaintiff need only prove the defendant caused his or her injuries to a “preponderance of the evidence.” This means that it is more likely than not that the defendant was at fault. If you take the scales of justice and have them even, all the plaintiff has to do it tilt the scale ever so slightly in his or her favor to prevail. The plaintiff need only prove his case to 51 percent against the defendant’s 49 percent in order to prevail.

If it is a personal injury case, the plaintiff’s attorney will often put the injured victim on the stand first. The attorney will ask his or client about the accident, what he or she was doing in the moments leading up to the accident, how fast he or she was driving, how much traffic was on the road, whether there were traffic signals or signs, weather and visibility conditions, the condition of the road (such as whether it was wet or dry, or had debris scattered in the lanes), whether the plaintiff was impaired in any way by alcohol, drugs (including illegal drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, or methamphetamines, prescription medication that could impair driving, or over-the-counter medications that have drowsiness and other side effects), how far away he or she was from the defendant when he or she first saw the other driver, and other questions establishing the defendant’s fault. The plaintiff’s lawyer will also call to the stand any percipient witnesses (people who witnessed the accident). In serious cases, the plaintiff’s attorney may hire the services of an expert accident reconstructionist to recreate the accident based on all of the evidence to establish the defendant’s liability. Note that after each witness has finished being examined by the plaintiff’s lawyer, the defense lawyer has the right to cross-examine him or her.

The plaintiff’s lawyer will establish “economic damages,” such as medical costs, lost wages, loss of earning potential, and property damage. The plaintiff’s lawyer will also ask his or her client about the pain and suffering he or she experienced (or continues to experience) as a result of the injury, and his or her inability to engage in pleasurable activities he or she used to engage in before the accident (“loss of enjoyment of life”). Medical doctors may be called as witnesses to testify as to the previous injuries the plaintiff suffered in the accident, and what the prognosis is for the patient in the future, such as permanent impairment of the limbs or the need for future surgeries. Where the loss of damages is substantial, the plaintiff’s lawyer will call to the witness stand a forensic accountant who will establish the lost wages over the victim’s life or period of disability. The victim’s employer may be called in to establish that the victim was a good solid worker and would have been in line for promotions and increases in salary had he or she not been injured or killed.

After the plaintiff’s lawyer rests the case-in-chief, the defense lawyer will present their side to the jury. The defense lawyer may attempt to place some or all of the blame for the accident on the plaintiff, and may bring in its own expert accident reconstructionist to dispute the plaintiff’s expert. Where future medical surgeries or problems are claimed by the plaintiff, the defendant will present its own medical experts to try to minimize the plaintiff’s claims.

After the defense counsel has rested its case, the plaintiff’s lawyer has the right to present evidence that conflicts with what the defense witnesses testified to. This is known as “rebuttal.” After both sides have rested their cases and there is not further rebuttal, the judge instructs the jury on the law. Jury instructions can be confusing to the average lay juror, as they are usually written in legal terms. Once the jury has been fully instructed on the law, the jury retreats to the jury deliberation room. Their first order of business is naming a foreperson.

Unlike criminal cases, which require a unanimous verdict to convict a defendant, in a civil case only 9 of the 12 jurors need to agree that the defendant is legally responsible (“liable”) for the plaintiff’s injuries. After finding the defendant to have been at fault and the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries, the jury’s next task is to come to a decision as to the amount of money to award the plaintiff.

If the jury returns a verdict in favor of the defense, your attorney will talk to you about the possibility of appealing the case to a higher court. There must be a substantial error by the judge that tainted the trial and made it impossible for you to get a fair trial. For example, if your attorney feels the trial court made unfavorable rulings against you that prevented you from getting a fair trial or gave the jury instructions that did not correctly state the law. If the jury comes back with a verdict in your favor, but it is for less than what you asked for, there is generally nothing you can do about it, unless you can demonstrate the judge did not properly instruct the jury on damages, or the jury committed misconduct in their deliberations that resulted in the reduced verdict, an admittedly hard thing to prove.

Share

What you should do if you are hit by a drunk driver – Know Your Legal Rights

Suppose you’re driving down the road one night when a car fails to yield the right of way to you and makes a left turn in front of you, colliding with your car. You have aches and pains but don’t seem to be seriously injured. You get out of your car to inspect the damage and the other driver approaches you, saying he’s sorry and asking you not to call the police. As the other driver gets closer to you, you smell alcohol and notice the driver isn’t walking a straight line. In short, you’ve just been hit by a drunk driver.

If you call the police, the other driver will probably be arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. However, there has been significant damage to your car and you want to go to the hospital to get checked out. The best thing for you to do is call 911 and request that police and paramedics be sent out. The other driver may be telling you he’ll pay for everything, but when he or she sobers up may have a change of mind. Also, the damage to your car and your medical expenses will probably run into several hundred, if not thousands, of dollars and the drunk driver may balk at paying you in full. In addition to the usual damages you are entitled to recover—medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage—you may well be entitled to recover punitive damages from the drunk driver. In such a case you should probably consult an experienced personal injury lawyer.

Share

What are Punitive Damages? – Learn Your Legal Rights California Lawyer

When one person injures another deliberately, in addition to recovering monetary compensation for medical expenses, lost past and future wages, pain and suffering, and other damages, the victim is also entitled to recover “punitive damages” from the wrongdoer. California law permits the recovery of punitive damages where there has been “oppression, fraud, or malice.” Malice is defined as conduct that is intended to cause injury to another person or despicable conduct that is done with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others.

Oppression is defined as despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person’s rights. There are three reasons justifying the imposition of punitive damages: (1) to punish the person for his deliberate and intentional misconduct; (2) to prevent or deter him or her from acting that way in the future; and (3) as an example to others that if they engage in similar conduct, they will have to pay a high price for it. (For this reason, punitive damages are sometimes called “exemplary damages.”)


Share

What if I cant afford an attorney? Los Angeles personal injury lawyers – No Win, No Pay

In personal injury cases—such as automobile collisions, motorcycle accidents, slips and falls, and the like—your lawyer gets paid only from the settlement or jury award that the attorney gets for you. You pay nothing up front or as you go along. The personal injury lawyer representing the injured party works on a “contingency fee” basis: He or she takes a percent of the settlement or award he or she manages to get for you. If the case goes to trial and the jury finds that the other party was not at fault (not “negligent”) and therefore does not have to pay a dime for your injuries, you do not owe the attorney anything for his or her legal services and representation of you.

The percent of the fees the attorney is entitled to generally depends upon at what stage of the lawsuit the case settlement. If the case settles before a formal complaint is filed with the court, the fee may be smaller than if the case settles after the complaint is filed. And the attorney’s fees may go up another level after a trial date is set. Generally, attorney’s fees are 33% of the recovery the attorney gets for you before the trial date is set and 40% after the trial date is set. While you may think these figures are high, studies show that injured victims receive more money in their pockets when they are represented by a lawyer than if they try to handle the matter itself. While you might be able to negotiate a minor fender bender on your own, for more serious injuries and death cases, you need to be represented by an experienced personal injury lawyer who will work his or her hardest to get you the highest amount for your injuries or loss.

Share

Whiplash and Soft Tissue Injuries – What this means for your Car Accident Case.

Many people are skeptical of claims for whiplash—until they are the victims of an injury that snaps their head and shoulders back and forth.. When they wake up the next day or two, they will feel extremely sore and stiff in their neck, upper back, and shoulders and may not make it to work or school.

Whiplash involves serious “soft-tissue” injuries to the tendons, ligaments, and muscles that support the neck, head, and back. Left untreated, a whiplash injury can cause tremendous pain and loss of range of motion for an extended period of time. You will need to be checked out by a doctor – preferably an orthopedic surgeon – to ensure that no bones were broken or displaced by the impact and that the injuries are indeed limited to the soft tissue in the neck, shoulders, and back area. You will most likely be put on a regimen of physical therapy to treat your injuries.

Share

Train Accident and Collisions – Your Legal Rights

When two trains collide, especially if they are traveling rather fast, the damage can be extensive. If a freight train crashes head-on with a passenger train at a fairly rapid speed, there are bound to be serious injuries and even deaths. Twisted metal and injured and dead passengers may be strewn over a large area of land.

When two trains on the same track are headed toward each other, it goes without saying that someone managing the flow of train traffic made a major mistake. Or warning lights that would have alerted the conductor or engineer to stop and wait for the other train to pass may not have been working properly or the train employees were preoccupied and did not see them. A passenger train is considered a “common carrier” and as such owes its passengers the highest duty of skill and care so as to ensure its passengers are not injured in any way.

Share

Close Head Injury – Traumatic Brain Injury Lawyer Los Angeles

Millions of people suffer a closed head injury each year. While most of them are minor and do not need treatment, over half a million victims suffer a closed head injury of such severity that they are hospitalized for observation and treatment. A “closed head injury” means that you suffered a blow or other traumatic injury to the head, but your skull wasn’t broken or penetrated, such as by a knife or gunshot. A closed head injury, also called a blunt or nonpenetrating head injury, is a traumatic brain injury (TBI) that is not penetrating, that is, the skull and the dura mater are not breached and the brain is not exposed. A person who has been hit in the head should be watched for signs and symptoms of a closed head injury and seek immediate medical care if any of the closed head symptoms listed below emerge.

A closed head injury can occur when the brain is suddenly and violently bounced against the skull from sudden acceleration or deceleration, such as when a passenger, properly wearing his or her seatbelt, in a vehicle going 65 suddenly crashes into the back of a stopped car, causing the passenger’s brain to suddenly hit the skull. This intracranial impact causes the brain to swell, which quickly increases the pressure within the skull (“intracranial pressure”). The increased pressure causes more damage to the brain, which causes more swelling, which causes more injury, etc. Some of the more frequent and dangerous injuries that can be suffered in closed head injury are:

  • Concussion
  • Brain contusion
  • Epidural hematoma
  • Subdural hematoma
  • Increased intracranial pressure

The most common causes of a closed head injury include traffic accidents, motorcycle and bicycle accidents, falls, physical assaults, and accidents at home (shaken baby syndrome is a example of a closed head injury), work, outdoors, or while playing sports. Some head injuries result in prolonged or non-reversible brain damage. This can occur due to bleeding or blood clots inside the brain or forces that damage the brain directly.
Some of the common injuries involved in a closed head injury include a concussion, a violent jarring or shaking that results in a disturbance of brain function, and may occur when the head strikes or is struck by an object; a concussion may cause temporary loss of consciousness or bleeding in and around the brain; and a contusion, which is essentially a “bruise” on the brain. When there has been a closed head injury, the brain is susceptible to bleeding and blood clots. A number of conditions can occur, such as a subarachnoid hemorrhage, an epidural hematoma, and a subdural hematoma, resulting in blood leaking into the brain or its adjacent structures.

Bleeding and blood clots in the brain are serious conditions since the increase in intracranial pressure can cause damage to brain tissue and loss of brain function, even death. In some cases, it is necessary for the victim to undergo brain surgery to drain the bleeding or remove the clot.

The symptoms of a serious closed head injury include:

  • Loss of consciousness, either momentarily or for an extended period of time
  • Inability to wake the victim
  • The person stops breathing
  • Changes in, dilated, or unequal pupils
  • Short-term memory loss
  • Nausea and vomiting, especially of the person vomits more than once
  • Chronic headaches and/or a stiff neck
  • Symptoms improve, then suddenly get worse (a change in consciousness)
  • Restlessness, clumsiness, or lack of coordination
  • Loss of change in sensation, hearing, vision, taste, or smell
  • Dizziness
  • Inability to move one or more limbs (paralysis)
  • Seizures and convulsions
  • Cerebrospinal fluid leaking from the mouth, ears, or nose (the fluid may be clear or bloody)
  • Bruising of the face, swelling at the site of the injury, or a scalp wound
  • Emotional, behavioral, and personality changes
  • Irritability (especially in children)
  • Slurred speech and other speech and language problems, or blurred vision
  • Confusion
  • Dizziness
  • Very high blood pressure
  • Very slow pulse

In all cases of injury to the head and neck, DO NOT move the victim’s neck and head unless absolutely necessary. Support the victim’s head in the position you found it. The bones of the spine (“vertebrae”) can be injured from movement of the head during trauma. Broken or displaced spinal bones can cut or put pressure on the nerves running through the middle of the vertebrae, which, if severed or pressured, can cause temporary or permanent paralysis and loss of feeing, resulting at its worst in quadriplegia or paraplegia, and even death.

The symptoms of a serious closed head injury usually show up immediately, while symptoms of a more mild case of closed head injury may take several days to weeks before they become apparent. Even if the skull is not fractured, the brain can bang against the inside of the skull and be bruised. The head may look fine, but complications could result from bleeding or swelling inside the skull. Brain injuries can range from mild to severe. A closed head injury can be diffuse, meaning that it affects cells and tissues throughout the brain, or the closed head injury may be focal, in which case the damage affects only a limited area, such as the speech center. In all cases involving serious trauma to the head, you should always assume the spinal cord is injured and take the proper precautions.

Some types of closed head injury will usually go away fairly quickly on their own, such as a slight concussion. Other closed head injuries left untreated will continue to get worse until the victim dies, such as from an untreated blood clot or bleeding in the brain. The only way for certain to tell the difference between a slight closed head injury and a serious one is with a cranial computed axial tomography scan (a “CT scan”), which looks at the brain and the skull using x–rays. If you suspect a person has suffered a severe closed head injury, you should call 911 immediately so the paramedics can assess the person and arrange for an ambulance to take the person to the hospital immediately if necessary.

People with serious closed head injuries are almost always admitted to the hospital for observation and checked on regularly. Closed-head injury patients are usually given repeated studies to ensure that the victim’s condition has not worsened. Occasionally, a closed head injury may cause elevated blood pressure within the skull. An intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor may be surgically inserted into the brain through the skull to measure the pressure. If the pressure rises too high, it may be necessary to do surgery to relieve and to decompress the brain. Death is a possibility. Intravenous medications may be used to control intracranial pressure as a temporary measure until the crises resolves on its own or surgery is performed.

When there is a closed head injury with bleeding inside the skull, the doctor must consider a number of factors to determine the correct treatment. Some of the factors the doctor will consider include the location of the bleeding, the severity of the symptoms, the presence of any other injuries, and the progression of the symptoms. Surgery may be required in some cases to remove a blood clot or release pressure on the brain. Other options include pressure monitors, medications to prevent seizures, and antibiotics to prevent infection. People with this type of injury often need a breathing tube inserted to help prevent further brain damage (“intubation”).
Often the victim of a closed head injury can start vomiting, which can lead to problems with the victim’s airway. If the victim is unconscious, support his or her head, neck and back and roll them as a unit to put the person on his or her side to allow the vomit to drain from the victim’s mouth so the person does not get asphyxiated by his or her own vomit. Again, because of the possibility of damage to the spinal cord, roll the person to one side by turning his or her head, neck, and back as one unit.

For a moderate to severe head injury, take the following steps:

  • Call 911
  • Check the person’s airway, breathing, and circulation. If necessary, begin CPR and rescue breathing

If the person’s breathing and heart rate are normal but the person is unconscious, treat the person as though he or she has suffered a spinal cord injury.

  • Stabilize the victim’s head and neck by placing your hands on both sides of the person’s head, keeping the head in line with the spines and preventing movement. Wait for medical help.
  • Stop any bleeding by firmly pressing a clean cloth on the wound. If the injury is serious, be careful not to move the person’s head. If blood soaks through the cloth, DO NOT remove it. Rather, place another cloth on top of it.
  • If you suspect a skull fracture, DO NOT apply direct pressure to the bleeding site, and DO NOT remove any debris from the wound. Cover the wound with sterile gauze dressing.
  • If the person is vomiting, roll the head, neck, and body as one unit to put the person on his or her side to prevent choking.
  • Children often vomit only once after a head injury This may not be a problem but you should call the doctor or paramedics for further guidance.
  • Apply ice packs to swollen areas.

It is an old-wives’ tale that a victim of a closed head injury should not be allowed to sleep. If a victim of trauma to the head does not exhibit any of the signs or symptoms of a closed head injury, there is no need to keep him or her awake. The sleeping victim who has suffered a closed head injury should be woken 30 minutes after falling asleep to ensure that he or she can be aroused. If you cannot wake the victim of a closed head injury 30 minutes after he or she has been asleep, call 911 immediately if you haven’t done so already.

For a mild head injury, no specific treatment may be needed. However, you should watch the person for the next 24 hours to see whether he or she displays any conduct symptomatic of a head injury. It is suggested that the person, while sleeping, be awaken every two to three hours and asked a simple person, such as “What’s your name?” If a child begins to play or run immediately after getting a bump on the head, serious injury is unlikely. Still, as with anyone who has suffered a head injury, the child should be watched closely for the next 24 hours. Acetaminophen (Tylenol) may be given to the person for a mild headache. Do not give aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin), or naprosen (Aleve), as these can increase the risk of bleeding. NOTE THAT YOU SHOULD NEVER GIVE A CHID ASPIRIN BECAUSE OF THE RISK OF DEVELOPING A SERIOUS MEDICAL CONDITION CALLED REYE’S SYNDROME.

The degree and rate of recovery of a victim who suffers a closed head injury varies from person to person. The amount of time spent unconscious or in a coma, as well as how much of normal activity is recovered in the first month, are good indicators of long-term recovery.

Many closed head injuries are preventable if the person uses due care before engaging in the activity. For instance, wearing a seat belt will often save you from serious injury or death if you are involved in an automobile accident. Always wear a proper-fitting helmet during activities that could result in head injury, such as when operating or a passenger when operating or being a passenger on a motorcycle or bicycle. Helmets can prevent serious head injuries if you get into an accident. Children should be wearing an appropriate helmet when skateboarding, inline skating, or engaging in bicycle motocross. It may not be “cool” among his or her rebellious skateboarding and motocross buddies, but it is immensely more cool than falling off the skateboard or motocross cycle and sustaining a serious closed head injury that leaves the person in a persistent vegetative state. Bicyclists should obey all traffic rules and regulations, and at night they should wear bright, reflective clothing and equip their bikes with proper headlights and rear red flashers.

If you have been injured or a loved one killed in an accident causing a serious closed head injury due to another person’s carelessness (“negligence”), you should contact an experienced personal injury attorney as soon as possible. The attorney will want to send his or her investigator to the scene of the accident as soon as possible to gather evidence, take pictures of the scene before it has been cleaned up or altered in any way, and get statements from witnesses while their memories are still fresh.  Call now and speak with a lawyer for a free legal consultation.

Share

Frivolous Insurance Company Conduct

We have all heard the stories of people filing frivolous or ungrounded lawsuits in an attempt to get a quick settlement from the insurance company. This practice is, for the most part, unfounded and is condemned by the various Bar Associations. And only a few unethical attorneys engage in this sort of thing, as the settlements tend to be fairly low and the attorney’s fees do not amount to much. Of course, on those few occasions when a frivolous case results in a large settlement, the news media and certain radio and television talk show hosts can’t criticize it and the legal system enough.

What is much more common is the wrongdoer’s insurance company refusing to pay a reasonable sum to compensate the injured victim even where their insured is clearly at fault, the amount of damages are reasonable and substantiated by such things as medical bills and lost wages, and the limits of the insurance policy easily cover the amount demanded. If a person filed a frivolous lawsuit in order to get a quick settlement, the insurance company can usually get the case dismissed before trial. But there is nothing stopping an insurance company from asserting a frivolous defense.

For example, suppose a person is injured in an automobile accident that is clearly the fault of the insurance company’s insured. Liability is so clear that the police officers who investigate the aftermath of the accident issue one or more traffic tickets to the other driver. There is a $100,000 insurance policy, and your damages are only $25,000. The insurance company says it will pay only $7,500 and not a penny more to settle the claim; otherwise, you have to take them to court and have a full-blown trial.

The insurance company tries to intimidate you by flooding your attorney with paperwork that takes hours to complete. The insurance company hopes to wear down your lawyer so he or she will advise you to accept the paltry offer. As long as the insurance company is doing nothing to delay the case, it is within its rights to aggressively engage in pre-trial investigation (“discovery”), such as taking your deposition.

Insurance companies sometimes mount frivolous defenses to send a message to the plaintiffs’ bar that if its inadequate settlement offers are not accepted, the lawyers can expect to spend hours upon hours working on the case, preparing it for trial, and then trying the case.

Unfortunately, while an insurance company (through its insured) can sue a person who unsuccessfully sued them for “malicious prosecution,” the injured victim has no right to bring a “frivolous defense” lawsuit against the insurance company, regardless of how outrageous or trivial the insurance company’s defense was.

The truth is that there are many more legitimate cases that are being denied fair and full compensation than there are frivolous cases that are being settled successfully.

Share